Zoning appeals offer property owners a critical opportunity to challenge land-use decisions that restrict their development plans or property rights. However, many appeals fail before they reach a hearing, while others are denied despite significant effort and investment. Understanding the most common reasons appeals get rejected is essential for property owners, developers, and anyone navigating the complex landscape of land-use regulations.
The reality is sobering: a substantial percentage of zoning appeals are denied each year, often due to preventable mistakes and oversights. Property owners frequently underestimate the complexity of the appeal process, believing that a reasonable argument or legitimate need is sufficient to overturn a zoning decision. In practice, successful appeals require meticulous attention to procedural requirements, comprehensive documentation, compelling evidence, and strategic presentation before local zoning boards.
This comprehensive guide explores the most common reasons zoning appeals get denied, drawing on years of experience in land-use and zoning matters. By understanding these pitfalls, you can better prepare your appeal and significantly improve your chances of success.
One of the most frequent reasons zoning appeals fail is that applications contain incomplete information or fail to meet procedural requirements. Zoning boards are bound by local ordinances that specify exactly what information must be included in an appeal application. When applications fall short, boards have the authority—and often the obligation—to reject them outright.
Common deficiencies include missing signatures, incomplete property descriptions, inadequate legal descriptions of the subject property, missing survey information, or failure to include required supporting documentation. Some applications lack clear identification of the specific zoning code sections being challenged or fail to explain the basis for the appeal with sufficient detail.
Additionally, applications submitted after statutory deadlines are automatically rejected. Most jurisdictions impose strict filing deadlines—often 30 to 60 days from the date of the zoning decision. Missing these deadlines, even by a single day, results in dismissal of the appeal regardless of its merits.
The filing fee represents another common oversight. Property owners sometimes submit applications without the required fee or submit insufficient payment. Boards typically will not process applications until fees are paid in full, and delays in payment can result in missed deadlines.
Professional guidance is invaluable at this stage. Experienced land-use attorneys understand the specific requirements of each jurisdiction and ensure that applications are complete, accurate, and filed within all applicable deadlines. This foundational step often determines whether an appeal will even be heard.
Even when an application is properly filed, appeals frequently fail because the evidence presented is insufficient to support the requested relief. Zoning boards make decisions based on the record before them, and that record must contain compelling, admissible evidence that justifies overturning the original zoning decision.
Many property owners present only their own testimony or rely on general statements about why they believe the zoning restriction is unfair. However, zoning boards require substantial evidence—expert testimony, comparable property analyses, market studies, engineering reports, environmental assessments, or other objective documentation—demonstrating the need for the requested variance or exception.
For example, if you're seeking a variance to construct a building that doesn't comply with setback requirements, you'll need evidence showing why strict compliance would cause unnecessary hardship. This might include an appraisal demonstrating that the property cannot be used in a reasonable economic manner under current zoning, survey information showing physical constraints, or expert testimony about soil conditions or topography that prevent compliant construction.
Similarly, if you're requesting a conditional use permit, you must provide detailed evidence that the proposed use will not negatively impact the neighborhood. This requires traffic studies, parking analyses, noise assessments, or other documentation addressing the board's legitimate concerns about compatibility with surrounding properties.
Many appeals also fail because the evidence presented is simply not credible or is easily contradicted. Boards are experienced in evaluating testimony and documentation. If your evidence appears exaggerated, unsupported by facts, or contradicted by public records, the board will likely discount it. Professional experts with credentials in relevant fields carry significantly more weight than unsubstantiated claims.
Documentation must also be organized, clear, and easy for the board to understand. Appeals buried in voluminous, disorganized materials often fail because board members cannot locate or comprehend the key evidence supporting your position. Strategic organization and clear presentation of evidence substantially improve appeal success rates.
Many appeals are denied because the applicant's proposed use or development simply does not comply with applicable zoning code provisions, and no exception or variance is available. This fundamental issue is sometimes overlooked by property owners who focus on why they believe the zoning is unfair rather than on whether their proposal actually meets code requirements.
Zoning codes typically specify permitted uses for each zoning district, dimensional requirements (setbacks, height limits, lot coverage), parking requirements, landscaping standards, and numerous other regulations. If your proposed development violates any of these requirements and you cannot obtain a variance or conditional use permit, your appeal will be denied.
For example, if your zoning district permits single-family residential uses and you propose a multi-family apartment building, you cannot obtain approval unless the code provides a mechanism for such a use—typically through a conditional use permit or rezoning. Simply arguing that the community needs more housing will not overcome the code's explicit restriction.
Similarly, if the code requires a minimum lot size of one acre and your property contains only 0.8 acres, you need a variance from the dimensional requirement. A variance requires demonstrating that strict compliance causes unnecessary hardship due to unique characteristics of the property—not merely that you wish the requirement were different.
Understanding the specific code provisions applicable to your property is essential before pursuing an appeal. Many property owners discover too late that their proposed use simply is not permissible under any available mechanism, making the appeal futile from the start.
For dimensional variances—requests to deviate from setback, height, lot coverage, or similar requirements—applicants must demonstrate that strict compliance with the zoning code creates unnecessary hardship. This is a specific legal standard that requires more than merely showing inconvenience or reduced property value.
Unnecessary hardship typically requires showing that the property has unique physical characteristics that distinguish it from other properties in the zoning district and that these characteristics make compliance with the code impossible or prohibitively expensive. Common examples include irregular lot shapes, unusual topography, environmental constraints, or pre-existing nonconforming conditions.
Many variance applications fail because applicants cannot meet this standard. For instance, if you own a property in a residential district where the average lot is 0.75 acres, and yours is 0.5 acres, this alone does not constitute unnecessary hardship—the code was presumably written with knowledge of typical lot sizes in the district. You must show something unique about your specific property that distinguishes it from others.
Additionally, the hardship must result from the zoning code itself, not from the applicant's circumstances. If you purchased the property knowing it could not be developed as you desired, or if your financial constraints prevent compliant development, these do not constitute unnecessary hardship under zoning law. The hardship must be inherent to the property itself.
Applicants also frequently fail to demonstrate that granting the variance will not adversely affect the public interest or the character of the neighborhood. Even if the hardship is unnecessary, the variance can be denied if it would harm neighbors or the community. Comprehensive evidence addressing impacts on surrounding properties is essential.
When seeking a conditional use permit—a mechanism that allows uses not permitted by right in a zoning district—applicants must demonstrate compliance with the specific standards established by the zoning code. These standards vary by jurisdiction but typically require demonstrating that the proposed use will not negatively impact traffic, parking, noise, lighting, or the neighborhood's character.
Many conditional use permit applications fail because applicants do not adequately address these standards. The board cannot approve a conditional use permit if the evidence does not support findings that the proposed use meets applicable standards. Vague assertions that the use will be compatible with the neighborhood are insufficient.
For example, if you're seeking approval for a professional office in a residential district, the code might require demonstrating that traffic generation will not exceed certain thresholds, that parking will be adequate for employees and visitors, that operating hours will not disturb neighbors, and that exterior appearance will be compatible with residential character. Each of these requirements demands specific evidence.
Additionally, applicants sometimes fail to address legitimate concerns raised during public hearings. If neighbors testify about specific impacts they anticipate, your response must directly address these concerns with evidence. Simply dismissing neighbor concerns without a substantive response weakens your application significantly.
The conditions imposed on conditional use permits are also critical. Many applications fail because applicants refuse to accept reasonable conditions that would mitigate impacts. Boards have the authority to impose conditions limiting hours of operation, requiring landscaping buffers, mandating traffic management plans, or implementing other measures to protect the neighborhood. Refusing reasonable conditions often results in denial.
Beyond incomplete applications, numerous procedural errors can result in appeal denials. These technical violations might seem minor, but they can be fatal to an appeal if they prevent the board from properly considering the application.
Common procedural errors include failure to provide proper notice to affected parties, inadequate public notice of the hearing, failure to allow adequate time for public comment, or violation of open meeting laws. Some applicants fail to provide the required copies of their application materials to board members before the hearing, making it impossible for the board to review the documentation.
Additionally, some appeals are denied because applicants or their representatives fail to comply with the rules of evidence or proper hearing procedures. If testimony is presented improperly, exhibits are not properly authenticated, or arguments exceed the scope of the appeal, the board may exclude the evidence or strike testimony from the record.
Timing issues also create problems. Some applicants request continuances that push hearings beyond statutory timeframes for board decisions. Others fail to appear for scheduled hearings or arrive unprepared, resulting in dismissals or default denials.
Professional representation significantly reduces the risk of procedural errors. Attorneys experienced in zoning appeals understand the specific procedural requirements of each jurisdiction and ensure that all technical requirements are met.
Many zoning appeals fail because applicants underestimate or inadequately respond to neighborhood opposition. While neighborhood preference alone cannot override zoning code provisions, organized opposition can influence board decisions, particularly when neighbors raise legitimate concerns about impacts.
An effective response to opposition requires understanding the specific concerns neighbors have raised and presenting evidence that directly addresses them. If neighbors worry about increased traffic, you need traffic studies. If they fear parking problems, you need parking analyses. Generic assurances that there will be no problems are unconvincing.
Additionally, some applicants alienate board members or neighbors through confrontational presentations. Zoning boards are often composed of volunteers from the community. Dismissing their concerns or being disrespectful during hearings creates negative impressions that can influence decisions.
Conversely, applicants who acknowledge legitimate concerns and propose thoughtful solutions often succeed even when opposition exists. Demonstrating that you've listened to concerns and modified your proposal to address them shows good faith and increases the likelihood of approval.
In some cases, applicants have also failed to adequately distinguish their proposal from similar applications that were previously denied. If the board has rejected comparable applications, you must explain why your proposal is different and why it should succeed where others failed.
Zoning codes establish specific purposes for each zoning district. For example, a residential district might be intended to preserve single-family character, protect children's safety, and maintain property values. Appeals that contradict these stated purposes are difficult to approve.
Many applicants fail to align their proposals with the purposes of the zoning district. If you're seeking approval for a commercial use in a residential district, you must explain how your proposal furthers or at least does not undermine the district's stated purposes. Arguing that the community needs the use you propose is not sufficient if it contradicts the district's fundamental purposes.
Additionally, applicants sometimes misunderstand the standards applicable to their specific request. Different mechanisms for obtaining approval—variances, conditional use permits, rezoning, special exceptions—have different standards and different burdens of proof. Applying the wrong standard to your appeal weakens your position significantly.
For instance, the standard for granting a variance differs substantially from the standard for approving a conditional use permit. If you present your case as if you're seeking a conditional use permit when you've actually applied for a variance, your evidence may not address the correct legal standard, resulting in denial.
Some appeals are denied because the applicant lacks legal standing to challenge the zoning decision or because the proper parties are not involved in the appeal. Standing requires that the applicant have a direct, legally cognizable interest in the property or decision being appealed.
For example, if you're not the property owner and do not have a lease or other legal interest in the property, you may lack standing to appeal a zoning decision. Similarly, if you're seeking approval for a use that benefits you personally but you're not the property owner, standing issues may arise.
Additionally, if multiple parties have interests in the property—such as a mortgagee or co-owner—the appeal may need to include all interested parties. Failing to include necessary parties can result in dismissal of the appeal.
Some appeals also fail because the applicant is challenging a decision that is not properly before the board. For instance, if you're appealing a decision made by a planning commission, you may need to appeal to a different body or follow different procedures.
Most jurisdictions have comprehensive plans or master plans that establish long-term development goals and policies. Zoning decisions are typically made in accordance with these plans. Appeals that contradict adopted comprehensive plans or established policies face significant obstacles.
Many applicants fail to consider or address how their proposals align with comprehensive planning documents. If the comprehensive plan identifies an area for low-density residential development and you're seeking approval for high-density commercial use, you must explain why the board should deviate from the adopted plan.
Additionally, some jurisdictions have adopted specific policies addressing particular land uses or areas. If your proposal contradicts these policies, you must present compelling evidence justifying deviation from them.
Professional land-use attorneys review comprehensive plans and adopted policies before filing appeals, ensuring that proposals are positioned to align with long-term community goals or present evidence justifying exceptions to adopted policies.
Appeals involving complex technical issues—such as traffic impacts, environmental concerns, engineering feasibility, and market analysis—require expert testimony from qualified professionals. Many appeals fail because applicants rely on their own testimony or that of unqualified individuals rather than retaining appropriate experts.
For instance, if traffic impacts are a concern, a traffic engineer should conduct a study and testify about findings. If environmental issues are relevant, an environmental consultant should provide expert analysis. If the property's economic viability is in question, an appraiser or market analyst should provide a professional opinion.
Additionally, experts must be properly qualified and credible. Board members are experienced in evaluating expert testimony and can quickly identify consultants who lack appropriate credentials or whose opinions are not grounded in accepted professional standards.
Some applicants also fail to retain appropriate professionals at the outset, instead hiring consultants only after initial application denials. Early professional involvement enables strategic planning and ensures that evidence is properly developed from the outset.
Zoning boards are sensitive to misrepresentation or inconsistency in application materials. If your written application differs from your oral testimony, or if you present conflicting evidence about the property or proposed use, the board will likely view your credibility as compromised.
Some applicants inadvertently misrepresent facts—for example, understating traffic impacts, overstating the property's uniqueness, or mischaracterizing existing conditions. Once a board perceives misrepresentation, even if unintentional, it becomes difficult to regain credibility.
Additionally, consistency across all application materials is essential. Your site plans, traffic studies, architectural renderings, and written descriptions must all align. Discrepancies between different materials raise questions about the accuracy of your entire application.
Professional preparation of application materials, with careful review for consistency and accuracy, prevents these credibility-damaging errors.
Some appeals fail due to poor timing or strategic decisions. For example, if you file an appeal immediately after a zoning decision without allowing time for neighborhood concerns to be addressed or for your proposal to be refined, you may face stronger opposition than necessary.
Conversely, waiting too long to file an appeal risks missing statutory deadlines. The window for filing is often narrow, and delays can result in dismissal.
Additionally, some applicants pursue appeals when other strategies might be more effective. For instance, seeking rezoning rather than a variance, or pursuing a conditional use permit rather than a variance, might be more appropriate depending on circumstances. Choosing the wrong mechanism for your request can doom the appeal from the start.
Strategic consultation with experienced professionals before filing ensures that you pursue the most effective approach and that timing is optimal for success.
While not every appeal requires an attorney, many appeals fail because applicants lack professional guidance in navigating complex zoning procedures and standards. Attorneys experienced in land-use and zoning matters understand the specific requirements of each jurisdiction, the standards applicable to different types of appeals, and strategies for presenting compelling cases.
Professional representation also ensures that procedural requirements are met, that evidence is properly developed and presented, that written submissions are clear and persuasive, and that oral arguments are strategic and effective. Additionally, attorneys can identify potential weaknesses in your position early and develop strategies to address them.
Many property owners view legal representation as an unnecessary expense, only to end up spending far more on failed appeals and delayed development. Early professional consultation often saves money by preventing costly mistakes.
If you're considering a zoning appeal, consulting with experienced land use and zoning attorneys who guide development projects through approvals can significantly improve your chances of success. Professional guidance ensures that your appeal is properly prepared, strategically positioned, and presented effectively before the zoning board.
Understanding why appeals fail is the first step toward improving your chances of success. Several key strategies can substantially increase the likelihood that your appeal will be approved.
First, ensure that your application is complete and accurate. Review all applicable code provisions and local procedures before filing. Include all required information, supporting documentation, and fees. Meet all deadlines.
Second, develop comprehensive evidence supporting your request. Retain appropriate professionals—engineers, architects, traffic consultants, appraisers, environmental specialists—to provide expert analysis and testimony. Ensure that evidence directly addresses the legal standards applicable to your appeal.
Third, understand and address the concerns of the zoning board and potential opponents. Anticipate questions and objections, and develop evidence and arguments that directly respond to them. Demonstrate that you've listened to concerns and considered them in developing your proposal.
Fourth, ensure consistency and accuracy across all application materials. Have experienced professionals review your written submissions, site plans, and other documentation to identify and correct any inconsistencies or errors.
Fifth, consider the strategic approach to your request. Determine whether a variance, conditional use permit, rezoning, or other mechanism is most appropriate for your situation. Consult with professionals who understand the standards and procedures for each approach.
Finally, present your case professionally and persuasively. Organize your evidence clearly, present testimony effectively, and make written and oral arguments that are compelling and grounded in applicable law and code provisions.
For comprehensive assistance with zoning appeals and land-use matters, the team at Schuster Law offers experienced guidance to protect your property rights and achieve favorable outcomes. With proven experience in zoning hearings and land development matters, professional guidance can make the difference between a denied appeal and successful approval.
The most common reason zoning appeals are denied is the filing of incomplete or improperly filed applications. Many property owners submit applications that lack required information, miss procedural deadlines, or fail to include necessary supporting documentation. Zoning boards must follow strict procedural requirements, and applications that do not comply are often rejected before the merits of the appeal are even considered. This is why careful attention to application requirements and deadlines is critical. Working with experienced professionals who understand local procedures can prevent these preventable errors and ensure that your application is complete and properly filed from the start.
Yes, a zoning appeal can be denied even if you believe you have a legitimate reason for requesting it. Zoning boards must follow specific legal standards when evaluating appeals. Simply having a good reason is not sufficient—you must meet the legal standard applicable to your type of appeal. For variances, you must demonstrate that the hardship is unnecessary. For conditional use permits, you must show compliance with specific code standards. For other appeals, different standards apply. Additionally, your application must be properly filed, your evidence must be sufficient and admissible, and your proposal must comply with applicable code provisions. Professional guidance ensures that you understand the applicable legal standards and develop evidence that meets them.
The amount and type of evidence required depends on the nature of your appeal and the applicable legal standards. Generally, you must provide substantial evidence—objective documentation, expert testimony, and other materials—that directly supports your request and addresses the concerns of the zoning board. Vague assertions or general statements are typically insufficient. For complex appeals involving traffic impacts, environmental concerns, or other technical issues, you should retain qualified professionals to conduct studies and provide expert testimony. For simpler appeals, written documentation and testimony may be sufficient. Consulting with experienced professionals helps you determine what evidence is necessary for your specific situation and ensures that evidence is properly developed and presented.
If you miss the deadline for filing a zoning appeal, your appeal will almost certainly be dismissed. Most jurisdictions have strict statutory deadlines—often 30 to 60 days from the date of the zoning decision—for filing appeals. Missing these deadlines, even by a single day, results in automatic dismissal regardless of the merits of your appeal. There are limited exceptions for extraordinary circumstances, but these are rarely granted. Once an appeal deadline passes, your only remaining option may be to pursue rezoning or seek approval under different code provisions. This is why understanding and meeting filing deadlines is absolutely critical. Professional guidance ensures that you are aware of applicable deadlines and that your appeal is filed within the required timeframe.
While not every zoning appeal requires an attorney, professional legal representation significantly improves your chances of success. Attorneys experienced in land-use and zoning matters understand the specific procedural requirements and legal standards applicable to your jurisdiction. They can identify potential weaknesses in your position early, develop strategies to address them, ensure that your application is complete and properly filed, and present your case effectively before the zoning board. Additionally, attorneys can advise you on the most appropriate mechanism for your request—whether you should seek a variance, conditional use permit, rezoning, or other relief. For complex appeals or when substantial property interests are at stake, professional legal representation is highly recommended. Even if you decide not to retain an attorney for the entire process, consulting with an experienced professional before filing can prevent costly mistakes and improve your chances of success.
Zoning boards cannot deny an appeal solely because of neighborhood opposition. Their decision must be grounded in applicable zoning code provisions and legal standards. However, neighborhood opposition can be influential, particularly when neighbors raise legitimate concerns about impacts on traffic, parking, noise, or neighborhood character. If you can address these concerns with evidence and demonstrate that your proposal will not negatively impact the neighborhood, opposition is less likely to result in denial. Conversely, if you fail to adequately respond to legitimate neighbor concerns, the board may be persuaded to deny your appeal. The key is understanding the concerns neighbors have raised and presenting evidence that directly addresses them. Professional guidance helps you develop responses that are persuasive and grounded in evidence.
A variance is a request to deviate from specific code requirements—such as setback, height, or lot coverage restrictions—when strict compliance causes unnecessary hardship. A conditional use permit, by contrast, is approval for a use that is not permitted by right in a zoning district but is allowed if specific conditions are met. The legal standards for each are different. For a variance, you must demonstrate that the property has unique characteristics that distinguish it from other properties in the district and that strict compliance is impossible or prohibitively expensive due to these unique characteristics. For a conditional use permit, you must demonstrate that the proposed use complies with specific code standards and will not negatively impact the neighborhood. Understanding which mechanism is appropriate for your situation is critical. Applying for a variance when you should seek a conditional use permit, or vice versa, can result in denial even if your proposal has merit.
The timeline for a zoning appeal varies depending on local procedures, the appeal's complexity, and the zoning board's workload. Typically, from application filing to final decision takes several months to a year or more. Some jurisdictions have statutory timeframes within which the board must issue a decision—often 60 to 120 days from the hearing date. However, appeals can be delayed if additional information is required, if continuances are requested, or if the board is backlogged. Additionally, if your appeal is denied, you may have the right to appeal to a higher authority or pursue legal action, which can further extend the timeline. Early professional consultation can help you understand the timeline for your specific situation and plan accordingly. Planning projects with realistic timelines for zoning approvals prevents costly delays.
Your written zoning appeal application should include all information required by local code and procedures. Typically, this includes a clear description of the property and the zoning decision being appealed, the specific code sections involved, the basis for your appeal, and a detailed explanation of why the appeal should be granted. Include a legal description of the property, a survey showing property boundaries and dimensions, site plans showing the proposed development or use, and any other supporting documentation required by local procedures. Additionally, include evidence supporting your request—expert reports, traffic studies, appraisals, or other documentation that addresses the legal standards applicable to your appeal. Organize all materials clearly and include an index so that the zoning board can easily locate specific information. Professional preparation of written application materials ensures that all required information is included, that materials are organized clearly, and that your application makes a persuasive case for approval.
Yes, you typically have the right to appeal a zoning board decision if you disagree with it. However, the grounds for appeal are limited. You cannot appeal simply because you disagree with the board's decision or believe it is unfair. Instead, you must demonstrate that the board's decision was arbitrary and capricious, that it violated applicable law or code provisions, or that the decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Additionally, appeals of zoning board decisions are typically made to a higher authority—such as a planning commission, city council, or court—rather than back to the zoning board. The procedures and standards for these secondary appeals vary by jurisdiction. Understanding your appeal rights and the appropriate mechanism for appealing a zoning board decision is important. Professional guidance helps you determine whether appealing a decision is appropriate and what steps to take if you decide to pursue an appeal.
Preparing for your zoning appeal hearing involves several steps. First, thoroughly understand the applicable code provisions and legal standards for your type of appeal. Organize all supporting documentation and evidence clearly so that you can reference specific materials during the hearing. Prepare written and oral arguments that directly address the applicable legal standards and respond to anticipated questions or objections. If you have expert witnesses, ensure that they are prepared to provide clear, credible testimony and that their reports are organized and easy to understand. Anticipate questions the board might ask and prepare responses. If possible, visit a zoning board meeting to observe how hearings are conducted and how board members ask questions. Dress professionally and plan to arrive early. During the hearing, present your case clearly and professionally, listen carefully to questions, and respond directly without being defensive. If you have legal representation, work closely with your attorney to prepare for all aspects of the hearing. Professional preparation significantly improves your presentation and your chances of success.
Zoning appeals represent an important opportunity to challenge land-use decisions and protect your property rights. However, many appeals fail due to preventable mistakes—incomplete applications, insufficient evidence, procedural errors, or misunderstanding of applicable legal standards. Understanding the most common reasons appeals are denied is the first step toward improving your chances of success.
By ensuring your application is complete and properly filed, developing comprehensive evidence that directly addresses applicable legal standards, understanding and addressing the zoning board's concerns, and presenting your case professionally and persuasively, you can significantly increase the likelihood of approval.
The stakes involved in zoning appeals are often substantial. Denied appeals can delay development projects, reduce property values, and limit your ability to use your property as intended. Conversely, successful appeals open opportunities for development, increase property value, and protect your property rights.
Professional guidance from experienced land-use attorneys makes a meaningful difference in appeal outcomes. Early consultation allows you to understand your options, develop an appropriate strategy, and avoid costly mistakes. Whether you're facing a zoning restriction, seeking approval for a proposed use, or challenging a zoning board decision, experienced professionals can guide you through the process and help you achieve a favorable outcome.
If you're considering a zoning appeal or need guidance on land-use and zoning matters, consult experienced land-use attorneys who understand zoning hearings and development approvals. With strategic expertise and proven experience, professional guidance can help you navigate the complex zoning appeal process and achieve your development goals.
A client of Schuster Law
My husband and I were in a car accident and our car got t-boned. Andrew Valentin was the lawyer we chose to represent us. Andrew fought on our behalf with the other party's insurance company, making sure everything was made right. Between regular check-ins on us and follow through on the case, Andrew made sure we were well taken care of.
Laura VM
A Car Accident Client of Schuster Law