Crane Accidents at Work in Pennsylvania: Rigging, Signals and the Lift Plan

Dropped loads and struck-by injuries where the paperwork usually identifies the defendant.

  • 4.7 from 140 Google reviews
  • PA bar admitted since 1982
  • No fee unless we recover
  • Answered 24 hours
Kenneth R. Schuster, founding member of Schuster Law
Kenneth R. Schuster Founding Member. Practicing in Delaware County since 1982.

Crane injuries are compensable under workers compensation and typically involve several companies: the crane owner, the operator employer, the rigger, the signal person and the general contractor. The lift plan, inspection records and rigging documentation usually identify who is responsible.

Multiple employers, one lift

A crane lift on a Pennsylvania site rarely involves only one company. The crane may be owned by one, operated by an employee of another, rigged by a third, signalled by a fourth, all coordinated by a general contractor.

That is unfortunate for site safety and useful for an injured worker, because it means the party responsible for the failure is frequently not the employer whose compensation coverage bars a lawsuit.

What the documents show

  • The lift plan. Load weight, radius, configuration, ground conditions. Whether the lift as performed matched the plan is often the whole case.
  • Load charts and configuration. Whether the crane was within capacity for the radius used.
  • Rigging inspection. Slings, shackles and hooks are inspected on a schedule and the records exist.
  • Operator certification and the signal person’s qualification.
  • Ground bearing and outrigger setup, including cribbing and mat use.
  • Inspection and maintenance history for the crane itself.

The recurring failures

Two-blocking. Side loading. Exceeding capacity at radius. Outriggers not fully extended or set on inadequate ground. Failed or unsuitable rigging. Signals misunderstood between people who had not worked together. Loads carried over occupied areas.

Each of these points at a specific responsible party, which is why establishing what actually happened mechanically matters more than establishing who was standing where.

Power line contact

Contact between a boom or load line and an overhead conductor remains a leading cause of crane fatalities. Minimum approach distances apply, and the questions become whether the line was de-energised or insulated on request, whether a dedicated spotter was used, and whether the utility responded to a notification. That adds a utility defendant with substantial resources.

Move quickly

Cranes are demobilised and returned to their owners, sometimes within days. Rigging is put back into general stock. Ask for a preservation demand covering the crane, the rigging, the lift plan and the inspection records before any of it leaves the site.

The attorneys who handle these cases

Every one of these bar numbers is searchable on the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board register. The person who takes your call is the person at your hearing.

Questions people ask us about this

Who is liable in a crane accident?

Frequently several companies. The crane owner, the operator's employer, the rigging contractor, the signal person's employer and the general contractor may each carry responsibility, and most of them are not your employer, so compensation exclusivity does not protect them.

What evidence decides these cases?

The paperwork. The lift plan against what was actually performed, load charts and configuration, rigging inspection records, operator and signal person certification, outrigger and ground bearing setup, and the crane's own inspection and maintenance history.

The crane has already left the site.

That is common and it makes an early preservation demand important, covering the crane, the rigging, the lift plan and the inspection records. Rigging in particular gets returned to general stock quickly, at which point identifying the failed component becomes very difficult.

The boom touched a power line. Does the utility share responsibility?

Potentially. Minimum approach distances apply, and the questions are whether the line was de-energised or insulated after a request, whether a dedicated spotter was used, and how the utility responded to any notification. It adds a defendant with substantial resources.

I was not the operator, just working nearby.

Struck-by injuries from dropped or swinging loads are among the most common crane injuries, and being a bystander does not weaken the claim. If anything it removes the argument that you contributed, and the analysis of who is responsible is unchanged.

Both Delaware County offices

Walk in, or call. Both are answered 24 hours.

Tell us what happened

Two questions to start. No contact details until the second step, and nothing you send here commits you to hiring us.

  • You pay nothing unless we recover for you
  • A named attorney reads every case review
  • Both offices answer 24 hours, so you can call instead

Would rather talk now? (610) 601-2980

Step 1 of 2: what happened

Two questions in, and nothing about you yet. Free, and it does not commit you to hiring us.

Free case review

Tell us what happened. A named attorney reads every one, and you pay nothing unless we recover for you.

Step 1 of 2: what happened

Two questions in, and nothing about you yet. Free, and it does not commit you to hiring us.

Would rather talk now? (610) 601-2980