Train and Rail Crossing Accidents in Pennsylvania

Federal regulation, crossing signal records, and preemption arguments.

  • 4.7 from 140 Google reviews
  • PA bar admitted since 1982
  • No fee unless we recover
  • Answered 24 hours
Kenneth R. Schuster, founding member of Schuster Law
Kenneth R. Schuster Founding Member. Practicing in Delaware County since 1982.

Rail claims involve federal regulation as well as state law, and railroads raise preemption arguments to limit certain claims. What decides them is documentary: crossing signal maintenance and activation records, the locomotive event recorder, and sight distance at the crossing.

The evidence that decides it

  • The locomotive event recorder, which logs speed, brake application, and horn and bell use in the approach.
  • Crossing signal maintenance and activation records, including any history of malfunction or false activation.
  • Inspection and repair history for the crossing.
  • Sight distance, including vegetation, structures and stored rail cars obstructing the view.
  • Prior incidents at the same crossing, which establish notice.

Railroads preserve some of this as a matter of course and other parts only if asked. An early preservation demand is important.

Preemption

Railroads frequently argue that federal law preempts state law claims, particularly regarding train speed where the train was within federally authorised limits, and regarding crossing devices where federal funds participated in their installation.

Preemption is real and it is also frequently overstated. It does not bar every claim, and negligent maintenance, failure to sound warnings, obstructed sight lines and negligent operation may all remain available. It requires proper analysis rather than acceptance.

Crossings without gates

Many Pennsylvania crossings have only crossbucks or lights without gates. Whether the protection was adequate for the traffic volume, sight distance and train frequency at that crossing is a legitimate question, particularly where prior incidents occurred.

Trespasser and platform cases

Injuries to people on the tracks raise different questions, though duty is not always absent, particularly where a location was known to be regularly crossed and nothing was done. Platform and station injuries are more conventional premises claims against the operator.

Rail workers are different

Railroad employees are generally covered by the Federal Employers Liability Act rather than state workers compensation. FELA is fault based, which means a railroad worker must show negligence but can recover damages that workers compensation does not pay, including pain and suffering. It is a materially different system with its own deadlines, and it needs handling as such.

The attorneys who handle these cases

Every one of these bar numbers is searchable on the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board register. The person who takes your call is the person at your hearing.

Questions people ask us about this

What evidence matters in a rail crossing case?

The locomotive event recorder logging speed, braking and horn use in the approach, crossing signal maintenance and activation records including any malfunction history, inspection and repair history, sight distance including obstructions, and prior incidents at the same crossing.

The railroad says federal law bars my claim.

Preemption is real but frequently overstated. It commonly applies to train speed within federally authorised limits and to crossing devices installed with federal funds. It does not bar every claim, and negligent maintenance, failure to sound warnings, obstructed sight lines and negligent operation may remain available.

The crossing only had crossbucks, no gates.

Whether the protection was adequate for the traffic volume, sight distance and train frequency at that particular crossing is a legitimate question, especially where prior incidents had occurred there and nothing was upgraded.

Vegetation blocked the view of the track.

Sight distance obstruction is a recurring issue and it is documentable. Vegetation, structures and stored rail cars limiting the view of an approaching train go directly to whether the crossing was reasonably safe, and responsibility for clearance is generally assignable.

I work for the railroad. Is this workers comp?

No. Railroad employees are generally covered by the Federal Employers Liability Act rather than state workers compensation. FELA is fault based, so negligence must be shown, but it allows recovery of damages including pain and suffering that compensation does not pay. It has its own deadlines.

Both Delaware County offices

Walk in, or call. Both are answered 24 hours.

Tell us what happened

Two questions to start. No contact details until the second step, and nothing you send here commits you to hiring us.

  • You pay nothing unless we recover for you
  • A named attorney reads every case review
  • Both offices answer 24 hours, so you can call instead

Would rather talk now? (610) 601-2980

Step 1 of 2: what happened

Two questions in, and nothing about you yet. Free, and it does not commit you to hiring us.

Free case review

Tell us what happened. A named attorney reads every one, and you pay nothing unless we recover for you.

Step 1 of 2: what happened

Two questions in, and nothing about you yet. Free, and it does not commit you to hiring us.

Would rather talk now? (610) 601-2980